Apparently in Alabama it is unpopular to support gay
marriage. Now I will admit that I tend to oppose tradional beliefs just for the
sport of it, but in reality this is an unreasonable argument. If you are anti-gay rights fine but
think about this for a moment. If an old woman can leave her cat $90 million
and require that her executor donate the rest to charity when the cat dies and
she is considered sane and her wishes are carried out by the court then gay
marriage should be legal!
Here is the point. People want to say that just because the
church does not sanction them they are wrong. Well in my opinion the Bible has
been used to enslave nations and start more wars than it has been used as the
center of peace and tolerance. So don’t start me on how this is not a religious
argument! Well since this page is filled with white space let’s start me.
Before I make these highly intelligent points. I will say
this. I am for Christ. I am a Christian and I believe on the Name of Jesus. I
do however understand that it is my choice and my right as a human being to
choose how and by what means I will find and serve God in this life. Now I and
my fellow Saints fall out like tooth and tongue when it comes to the ideal that
we are required to believe only what the bible says and we can openly read one
or two versions and everything else is hypocrisy. And please do not behead me
but I must admit that if the only way to God is through Jesus Christ then it
would make Heaven a club for a certain kind of person and God had created us to
diverse for that to be true. And what about the Jews that had a direct covenant
before Christ came along? Why can’t we accept that the world is bigger than our
box? This is my problem with religion, and anything that limits logic.
Here I am ranting about the definition of Holy Matrimony.
Definitions are just socially adapted explanations of what something means. An
additional collection of words to describe another word. So here is my question
if two men living together becomes socially accepted as marriage will the
definition be amended? According to history it should be Webster modified the
dictionary with 15 new words in 2012. Because as we live we adapt and create,
so how can we believe that we should be bound by any idea?
We all have to a pick a side of the argument, but I say when
it comes down to it, it’s about human rights. It’s about a couple living
together for ten years, one of them dying and the other being left with nothing
because they didn’t hire an attorney and plan to have their time together cut
short by a drunk driver.
Why aren’t we fighting about how the media normalizes
homosexuality and promiscuity? Why aren’t we teaching our kids tolerance and
respect for the reality that the world is made up of people who are nothing
like them, just as much as it is people that are? They are born knowing that at
our core we are all the same regardless of our choices. We take that reality
from them by teaching them intolerance and hate.
So yes I a minority, single parent, inner city with an at
poverty income supports gay-marriage because at our core we all want the same
things regardless of our choices.
No comments:
Post a Comment